I suppose I should start off by
saying that this is not the first time I have seen “The Mean World Syndrome”.
Like many other students in Communication 497AJ I have seen this film in
several other courses that I have taken at the University of Massachusetts.
However, I must be clear that this film seems to resonate more deeply with me
each time I have seen it—I suppose that has to do with building on the
knowledge that I have gained from other classes I have taken in the
Communication major.
The
film “The Mean World Syndrome” focuses on the effect that heavy viewers of
television and other violent media sources experience life in what was deemed “The
Mean World” by George Gerbner. Basically this is means that those heavy viewers are
more not exactly more likely to commit violent acts but rather that they
are more likely to be fearful of violent acts being committed upon them. I
found the discussion that Gerbner gave about the difference between real
violence and “happy violence” to be especially intriguing this time around.
Gerbner uses the term “happy violence” to describe highly entertaining and not
disturbing scenes of violence that always lead to a happy ending. The biggest
problem with this kind of programming is of course that we are being desensitized
to real violence because we are so caught up in “happy violence”. We do not see
the images of the two continuing wars that we are fighting because those are
not happy, they are real and they are disturbing and obviously do not lead to a
happy ending and thus those images are off limits in the propaganda machine.
Gerbner
also talks about cultivation. In this sense Gerbner uses the term cultivation
to describe “a steady stream of messages and concepts that shape our view”.
These violent images, especially those involving Arabs and Muslims (clips shown
from “Reel Bad Arabs”) as well as Hispanic and Black peoples are key in
determining social stratifications that are leading us into class warfare. I couldn’t
help but think about the connections between Glassner’s idea that one of our
real fears should be about the class warfare that is unfolding right under our
noses and how it is created through these portrayals of racial minorities are
drug users, murderers, thieves, kidnappers, rapists, etc. This is just another
example of how we are allowing these unjust activities continue on and on while
we stand idly by and watch them for our own entertainment value.
The one
thing that disappointed me about the film “The Mean World Syndrome” was that
there were not really any solutions offered in the end. Gerbner merely suggests
that we need to create a system “that is more fair, equitable, just and less
damaging”. I understand that as a goal however I would have appreciated a bit
more of a substantial conclusion. There is no doubt that through the extensive
research that Gerbner completed in his lifetime he came up with some incredibly
valuable suggestions for change and I would have liked to hear some of them. With
that in mind, I must conclude by saying that this film was not only
entertaining but informative and relatable even after several past viewings.
I agree with your point about the way the film ended. I would have enjoyed some more examples of ways to counter the mean world syndrome as well. Maybe there is no true way to counter or escape the mean world syndrome. As Gerbner says media is to us as water is to a fish. Being conscious of the mean world syndrome may be the best solution available. Giving us this knowledge was the film's greatest asset.
ReplyDelete